Close
Seminar
series event

Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews

Exploring ways to improve transparency and rigour for Bradford Hill viewpoints in population health systematic reviews.

Centre for Evaluation logo on a green card

Bradford Hill viewpoints are among the most commonly used approaches for assessing causality in population health systematic reviews. Yet there is only limited guidance on their implementation, leading to considerable variation in how they are applied and reported. This seminar describes an example of how Bradford Hill viewpoints were used to assess causality in a systematic review on income inequality and health outcomes.

Michal will describe how the viewpoints incorporated counterfactual principles and how process tracing, a case study research method, was used to weigh evidence for each viewpoint. This structured approach offers practical guidance for improving transparency and rigour in causal assessment using Bradford Hill viewpoints within population health reviews.

Speaker

Michal Shimonovich

Michal is a Research Fellow in the School of Health & Wellbeing at the University of Glasgow. As of October 2025, she is the Principal Investigator on a British Academy-funded project exploring the relationship between homes, households, and health using linked address- and individual-level datasets.

Previously (August 2022–September 2025), she conducted real-world policy evaluations including the Scottish Child Payment with the Scottish Government and Public Health Scotland. Her research focuses on causal methods and evidence synthesis, with her PhD examining causal assessment approaches in population health systematic reviews.

Event notices

  • Please note that you can join this event in person or you can join the session remotely
  • Please note that the recording link will be listed on this page when available

Admission

Admission
Free and open to all. No registration required.

Contact