Close
Explore more Centres, Projects and Groups
Welcome
Welcome Banner
Banner
Mosquitoes in WHO tube. Credit: LSHTM

GenoScent

Investigating the genetic basis of human attractiveness to malaria mosquitoes.

Bottom Content
Logo List Links
Intro Blocks List
About

Combining genomics, chemical and behavioural ecology, GenoScent is investigating how humans produce natural mosquito attractants and repellents, with the aim of developing new types of protection against bites and malaria.

Who we are

Find out more about who’s involved in the project.

Donations
Twitter Embedded Code
Facebook Embedded Code
About
About GenoScent

Background

Some people are bitten more than others by mosquitoes, which is fundamentally important because those who get bitten less often are less likely to die from lethal mosquito-borne diseases like malaria. There is evidence that this differential attractiveness to mosquitoes is largely due to how you smell – previous work has shown that people who are less attractive to mosquitoes produce volatile organic compounds that act as natural mosquito repellents, and differences in attractiveness are partly controlled by a person’s genes. However, we still do not know how the body produces these chemicals or which genes control the process.

GenoScent is an MRC-funded project that aims to investigate the genetic basis of attractiveness to mosquitoes, both in the UK and in a natural host-vector-parasite system in The Gambia. The study will provide insight into the mechanisms that can affect our body odour, and make people more or less attractive to mosquitoes.

By collecting body odour from identical and non-identical twins in the UK and The Gambia, we will test the relative attractiveness of twins to the major vector of malaria, Anopheles mosquitoes, in behavioural experiments as well as investigate their odour profiles. The attractiveness and odour profile will then be used in an association study to correlate these traits with the presence of specific genetic variants in the volunteers’ genome.

Study objectives

Our three study objectives are to:

Identify human volatiles that attract or repel mosquitoes in people from the UK

By recruiting volunteers from the TwinsUK database, we will collect and characterise the body odour profile of 100 pairs of identical and non-identical twins, as well as measure their attractiveness to malaria mosquitoes using established laboratory behavioural studies, volatile collection techniques and analytical chemistry.

Test the genetic basis of attraction and repellency to mosquitoes using a natural host-vector parasite system

People who repel mosquitoes may have a survival advantage against mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria. Therefore, the genes involved in body odour production are likely to be under strong selective pressure in African populations exposed to the parasite. In this phase of the study, we will determine the relative level of attractiveness of 100 pairs of identical and non-identical Gambian twins.

The aim here is to also investigate potential interactions with malaria parasites in our study population, as when people are infected with the parasite, they become more attractive to mosquitoes which is linked to a change in their odour profile.

Identify genes involved in the production of mosquito repellents

In collaboration with the University of Nottingham and St George’s, we will conduct an association analysis between attractiveness, body chemistry and genetic variants using existing genome-wide polymorphism data from the twins.

Implications of this study

This study has the potential to provide new insights into the host-vector-parasite interaction, and could lead to novel ways to control diseases such as malaria.

By understanding how the body creates natural “resistance” to mosquito bites, this could allow us to develop a new treatment which stimulates production of repellent chemicals in susceptible humans, protecting them against mosquito bites and disease. This could revolutionise the way we protect ourselves against mosquito bites and mosquito-borne diseases.

Who we are
Team Block
Profiles List
Principal Investigator
Researchers
Collaborators

Professor John Armour

University of Nottingham

Professor John Pickett

Cardiff University

Professor Steven Lindsay

Durham University

Dr Rachel Allen

St George’s, University of London

Professor Umberto D’Alessandro

MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM
Publications

Here’s some of our relevant publications:

Publications
Publications List
Heritability of attractiveness to mosquitoes
Fernández-Grandon GM, Gezan SA, Armour JA, Pickett JA, Logan JG
2015
PLoS One, 10(4):e0122716
Identification of human-derived volatile chemicals that interfere with attraction of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
Logan JG, Birkett MA, Clark SJ, Powers S, Seal NJ, Wadhams LJ, Mordue Luntz AJ, Pickett JA
2008
J Chem Ecol, 34(3):308-22
Arm-in-cage testing of natural human-derived mosquito repellents
Logan JG, Stanczyk NM, Hassanali A, Kemei J, Santana AE, Ribeiro KA, Pickett JA, Mordue Luntz AJ
2010
Malar J, 9:239
Odours of Plasmodium falciparum-infected participants influence mosquito-host interactions
De Boer JG, Robinson A, Powers SJ, Burgers SLGE, Caulfield JC, Birkett MA, Smallegange RC, van Genderen PJJ, Bousema T, Sauerwein RW, Pickett JA, Takken W, Logan JG
2017
Sci Rep, 7(1):9283
Gametocytemia and Attractiveness of Plasmodium falciparum–Infected Kenyan Children to Anopheles gambiae Mosquitoes
Annette O. Busula, Teun Bousema, Collins K. Mweresa, Daniel Masiga, James G. Logan, Robert W. Sauerwein, Niels O. Verhulst, Willem Takken, Jetske G. de Boer
2017
J Infect Dis 2017 jix214. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix214
Identification of Human-Derived Volatile Chemicals that Interfere with Attraction of the Scottish biting midge, Culicoides impunctatus and their potential role as repellents
Logan J.G., N J. Seal, N M. Stanczyk, J I. Cook, M A. Birkett, SJ. Clark, S Gezan, L J. Wadhams, J A. Pickett, A. J Mordue (Luntz)
2009
Journal of Medical Entomology 46(2):208-19
Why do mosquitoes “choose” to bite some people more than others?
Logan J.G
2008
Outlooks on Pest Management 19 (6): 280-283