Expert comment: How do wildfires affect health and what can be done about it?
6 August 2026 London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine https://lshtm.ac.uk/themes/custom/lshtm/images/lshtm-logo-black.png
For people living in the northern hemisphere, this summer has been beset by deadly wildfires across parts of Europe, the US and Canada.
In the UK, more than 21,000 hectares had already burned by late July 2026 across 66 fires larger than 30 hectares, while England and Wales recorded their driest July in nearly two centuries and many areas moved into official drought.
Across Europe, Greece, Spain, France and the Netherlands are simultaneously fighting major fires, with Spain reporting over 186,000 hectares burned since January.
Dr Kamal Jyoti Maji, Research Fellow at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, explains why wildfires are so toxic and dangerous, and how to reduce harm.
How do wildfires affect health?
Wildfires affect health in a range of ways, and the immediate danger of flames is only one of them. The most direct harms are injury and death, destruction of homes and infrastructure, and the disruption evacuation causes to ongoing medical care, particularly for people who rely on regular treatment.
For the wider population, however, the main public health impact comes from smoke inhalation. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 (particles 30 times smaller than the width of a human hair), and other combustion pollutants can travel far beyond the fire itself. These particles have been linked to increased respiratory and cardiovascular illness, hospital admissions, premature death. A global analysis estimated that landscape-fire-related PM2.5 is associated with substantial excess mortality worldwide each year.
Wildfires typically also coincide with heatwave and drought conditions that are themselves dangerous. When heat, drought and fire smoke combine, as they are across Europe this summer, the cumulative health burden is greater than any single hazard alone.
There is also growing evidence on the psychological toll of wildfires, such as anxiety, trauma and a sense of loss due to repeated damage to familiar landscapes, which matters for people living through recurrent fire seasons even where physical exposure to smoke is limited.
What makes wildfire smoke particularly toxic?
Wildfire smoke is a complex mixture dominated by fine particulate matter (PM2.5), alongside carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The particles penetrate deep into the lungs and pass into the bloodstream, causing respiratory and cardiovascular harm.
When fire spreads into urban areas, the smoke can become even more toxic. As the fire burns through buildings, vehicles, plastics, or electrical equipment, they release additional contaminants not typically present in vegetation fires, including heavy metals and other synthetic products.
As a smoke plume from a wildfire drifts, it mixes and reacts with existing urban air pollution. Sunlight-driven chemical reactions between the smoke elements and urban emissions can generate secondary pollutants, including ground-level ozone and secondary organic aerosols. This can extend both the geographic reach and toxicity of the plume as it moves over towns and cities downwind of the fire.
How far can wildfire smoke travel, and how long can its effects on air quality and health persist?
The toxic particles caused by wildfire smoke can remain suspended in the atmosphere for days to weeks and be carried thousands of kilometres from their source. Southern and Western Europe's fires this summer are producing plumes that can, depending on wind direction, affect air quality well beyond the countries where the fires are burning, including in the UK.
A 2025 study traced the global footprint of the record-breaking 2023 Canadian wildfires, finding that smoke from these fires raised the PM2.5 levels in Europe to dangerous levels (above WHO guidelines) for around two weeks, and estimated that 22,400 premature deaths in Europe were caused by long-range exposure to the smoke. This is a striking demonstration that a wildfire burning on another continent can leave a measurable population-level impact thousands of kilometres downwind.
How long effects persist depends heavily on weather: without rain or a change of wind, smoke-laden air can sit over a region for several days, keeping pollution levels high even after the plume has technically passed. Because wildfire seasons increasingly bring repeated smoke episodes rather than a single event, cumulative exposure across a season - rather than any one bad-air day - is what matters most for population health.
Who is most affected by wildfire smoke?
Some groups are more vulnerable than others. Children breathe more air relative to their body weight and have lungs that are still developing. Older adults and people with pre-existing asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cardiovascular disease are at greater risk of harmful effects or hospitalisation from smoke. Particular caution is also warranted during pregnancy, given evidence linking air pollution exposure with adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight.
Other groups may also be disproportionately affected, including outdoor workers and firefighters, people experiencing homelessness, care home residents, and lower-income households who may live in poorer-quality housing or don’t have access to air conditioning or affordable air filtration.
Are wildfires more likely in Europe and the UK in the future, and how prepared are we for this growing risk?
Climate projections suggest that weather conditions favourable for extreme wildfire will become more frequent in many parts of Europe during this century, including regions that historically experienced relatively few large fires.
Rising temperatures, prolonged drought, lower fuel moisture (i.e. drier vegetation), earlier snowmelt, more frequent heatwaves and changing precipitation patterns are extending wildfire seasons and increasing fire intensity. At the same time, changes in vegetation and land use are increasing available fuels and exposing more people and infrastructure to fire.
Although Mediterranean countries remain at greatest risk, recent fires in the UK demonstrate that northern Europe is not immune. The UK has experienced increasing numbers of large heathland, peatland and grassland fires during exceptionally warm and dry periods.
Preparedness has improved through satellite monitoring, free databases such as Copernicus emergency services, and national wildfire response systems, but significant challenges remain. Compared with countries such as Australia or parts of North America, many European nations have historically invested less in wildfire risk management because fire was considered a relatively infrequent hazard.
What solutions should governments and public health authorities be considering now?
Research suggests that strategic, well-managed prescribed (controlled) burning can reduce the population’s overall exposure to wildfire smoke over time. This involves deliberately burning vegetation under carefully chosen conditions to reduce the amount of fuel available for more severe wildfires. But the evidence comes with important caveats. Research modelling forest management in the Central Sierra, California found the health benefits of prescribed burning for reducing smoke-related asthma impacts level off once burning goes beyond a moderate amount, because the fire’s own emissions start to erode the net benefit.
A survey of a medically vulnerable population in a Californian wildland-urban interface community (where homes and buildings meet or mix with wild plants, trees and open land) found many residents lacked confidence in their ability to protect themselves from smoke, whether from wildfire or prescribed burns. This is a reminder that technical solutions must be paired with genuine public trust and clear communication.
Taken together, the evidence points to six priorities for governments/agencies to consider:
- Expand strategic, well-timed prescribed burning and fuel management, planned jointly with air quality forecasting so that burns are scheduled to minimise smoke exposure to nearby communities.
- Invest in monitoring and modelling that can separate wildfire-specific PM2.5 from background pollution in near-real time, as current air quality standards do not distinguish between pollution sources.
- Build heat-health-alert-style early warning systems that link fire weather forecasts, air quality forecasts and health services so at-risk groups and clinicians receive advance notice.
- Issue clear guidance on restricting high-exposure activities such as outdoor events during high-risk days, with particular attention to vulnerable groups.
- Invest in clear, trusted public health messaging that is developed and tested with the communities most affected, given documented gaps in public confidence about how to protect their health during smoke events.
- Target ignition prevention directly, given that the large majority of wildfires are human-caused rather than naturally ignited. This could include sustained public awareness campaigns on disposable barbecues, discarded cigarettes, campfires and glass; temporary local restrictions or byelaws on high-risk activities during red-flag fire-danger days.
What practical steps can I take to reduce harm from smoke?
- Check local air quality index readings and air pollution alerts before planning outdoor activity.
- Keep windows and doors closed and, where possible, run an air purifier when there is smoke.
- Avoid strenuous outdoor exercise on high-pollution days.
- Keep asthma or other rescue medication accessible.
- If it is genuinely necessary to be outside in heavy smoke, use a properly fitted FFP2/FFP3 or N95-standard respirator rather than a cloth or surgical mask, which does not filter fine particles effectively.
- Seek medical advice promptly if chest pain, breathlessness or a persistent cough develops, and check on older or unwell relatives and neighbours during smoke episodes, since they may be less able to act on air quality warnings themselves.
About Kamal Jyoti Maji
Dr Kamal Jyoti Maji is a Research Fellow in Environmental Health at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine specialising in air pollution, environmental health and the health impacts of wildfires and prescribed burning. He has studied wildfires and air pollution in a range of locations including in Georgia and New Mexico in the US, India, and the UK. His research has explored how wildfire smoke affects PM₂.₅ and ozone levels, respiratory and cardiovascular health, emergency healthcare use, pregnancy outcomes and premature mortality, as well as the potential role of prescribed burning in reducing the severity of wildfires.
- Sources
Euronews (2026) Who started the fire? Inside Europe's arson intelligence gap. 29 July 2026.
UK Parliament (2024) Wildfire risks to UK landscapes. POSTnote 717. UK Parliament (https://post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-0717/).
World Health Organization (2021) WHO global air quality guidelines. Geneva: WHO.
World Meteorological Organization (2026) The long shadow of wildfires: smoke, air quality and health. WMO Bulletin, 75(1) (https://wmo.int/resources/bulletin/wmo-bulletin-vol-7501-air-issue/long-shadow-of-wildfires-smoke-air-quality-and-health).
If you enjoyed this article and would like to build a career in global health, we offer a range of MSc programmes covering health and data, infectious and tropical diseases, population health, and public health and policy.
Available on campus or online, including flexible study that works around your work and home life, be part of a global community at the UK's no.1 public health university.